On 28 June 2013, the President signed Federal Law No.
134-FZ of 28 June 2013 “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the
Russian Federation Relating to Combating Unlawful Financial Operations”, the
so-called “fly-by-night company law”.
The Law came into force on the date of its official
publication, i.e., 30 June 2013, except for certain provisions with other
effective dates. Below is an overview of the issues we believe to among the
most important.
TAX LEGISLATION
Recovery of tax arrears from subsidiaries/parent
companies
The list of cases when tax audits might result in
additional taxes being recovered from related /head organisations (subsidiary /
shareholder companies) in a court of law has been expanded (sub-clause 2,
clause 2, article 45, of the Russian Tax Code):
• transfer
of funds or other property to the head/related organisation after a tax audit
has been initiated;
• proceeds
have been transmitted or funds or other property have been transferred to
head/related organisations via a combination of related operations or in favour
of the taxpayer's related parties.
Arrears will be recovered pro rata the share of
proceeds received from sold goods (works, services), the share of funds
transferred, the value of other property, subject to the tax authorities having
proved a connection between such actions and the tax payment arrears.
New grounds for the tax authorities to request
documents, including within the scope a chamber tax audit
The tax authorities will be entitled to demand that a
taxpayer provide source and other documents and analytical tax ledgers during a
chamber tax audit on the basis of a revised tax return reducing the tax amount
or increasing losses, submitted after expiry of two years. Moreover, the tax
authorities will be able to request transaction-related documents from the
parties thereto or other persons holding relevant documents, including banks,
beyond the scope of tax audits, subject to reasonable necessity to do so.
New grounds for the tax authority to suspend
operations on a bank account
New grounds for suspension of operations on a bank
account have been added: a corporate taxpayer's failure to fulfil its
obligation to provide the tax authority in a timely fashion with a receipt
confirming receipt of a request for documents, a request for explanations
and/or notice of summons to the tax authority's office (received via electronic
communication channels).
Possibility for the tax authorities to use the results
of investigative activities
The Federal Law “On Investigative Activities” has been
amended to allow the tax authorities to use the results of investigative
activities in exercising their powers of control and supervision over
compliance with the legislation on taxes and levies and their powers relating
to ensuring representation of state interests in bankruptcy cases, as well as
in exercising their powers in the sphere of state registration of legal
entities.
Tax authorities obtain bank account statements
relating to individuals and individual entrepreneurs
Among other things, the amendments to a number of
legislative acts have provided the tax authorities with an opportunity to
request that banks provide them with letters of information relating to bank
accounts, bank deposits and/or account, deposit cash balances, statements on
operations on bank accounts, deposits of organisations, individual
entrepreneurs and unincorporated individuals, as well as statements on e-money
balances and e-money remittance, on the basis of a substantiated request. The
tax authorities may make such a request, including beyond the scope of tax
audits, subject to reasonable necessity. In this event, the tax authorities
require the approval of a higher tax authority or Head/Deputy Head of the
Federal Tax Service of Russia.
LEGISLATION ON REGISTRATION OF
LEGAL ENTITIES
Amendments to the legislation on state registration of
legal entities
The given Law amends the legislation relating to state
registration of legal entities. The most significant amendments are the
following:
• the
law establishes a legal entity's obligation to reimburse other participants in
civil turnover for losses caused by failure to provide, delayed provision or
provision of unreliable legal entity-related data to the Unified State Register
of Legal Entities (the “Companies’ Register”);
• the
law establishes an individual's right to send to the registration authority
his/her written objections against an entry being made in his/her respect into
the Companies’ Register. In the event of the objections specified above,
registration should not be performed in relation to such an individual;
• the
law obliges the registration authority to verify data to be included in the
Companies Register.
LEGISLATION ON COMBATING MONEY
LAUNDERING
The beneficial owner concept has appeared
The Federal Law “On Combating Money Laundering and
Financing of Terrorism” introduces the concept of a “beneficial owner”. The
beneficial owner is an individual, who, directly or indirectly (via third
parties), ultimately owns (holds a dominant share of at least 25% in the
capital) a corporate client or is able to effect control over the client.
Clients of organisations conducting operations with cash funds or other
property will be obliged to provide such organisations with information about
their beneficiaries.
CRIMINAL LEGISLATION
Criminal liability for money laundering
Articles 174 and 174.1 of the Russian Criminal Code
are amended to change the sanctions for such crimes and, in a number of cases,
make the punishment for laundering money obtained through crime more stringent.
In accordance with the new amendments, the laundering-related articles will
apply when crimes relating to funds involve evasion of tax, customs payments
and non-repatriation of foreign currency funds (the clause relating to
exclusion of the crimes provided for in articles 193, 194, 198, 199, 199.1 and
199.2 of the Russian Criminal Code has been deleted).
Financial operations and other operations with funds
or other property are recognised as large scale operations if they are for an
amount exceeding 1.5 m Roubles and as very large scale operations - if for 6 m
Roubles. Previously, an amount exceeding 6 m Roubles used to be a large amount
and no very large amount was established.
Stricter criminal liability for non-repatriation of
foreign currency earnings
Article 193 of the Russian Criminal Code is amended to
envisage stricter punishment for evasion of repatriation of funds in foreign
currency or in the currency of the Russian Federation. Large scale
non-repatriation now means non-repatriation of more than 6 million Roubles
during the year and the maximum sanction in this case will be up to 3 years'
imprisonment. In accordance with the amendments, very large scale
non-repatriation means non-repatriation of 30 m Roubles and the maximum
sanction is up to 5 years' imprisonment.
Previously, a large amount used to be defined as an
amount in foreign currency exceeding 30 m Roubles, and a very large amount used
not to be determined, and only the head of the company was subject to criminal
liability.
Criminal liability for use of false documents or
fly-by-night companies in remitting funds to non-residents
The Russian Criminal Code now has a new article,
193.1, which establishes a maximum sanction of 5 years for currency operations
relating to remittance of funds in foreign or Russian currency to
non-residents' accounts using false documents and a legal entity incorporated
for committing one or several crimes. Moreover, if such crimes are committed by
a group of persons or for a very large amount, the sanction will be
imprisonment for a period of from 5 to 10 years. 6 m Roubles and 30 m Roubles
now constitute a large amount and a very large amount, respectively.
This is an innovation in the criminal legislation. Its
purpose is quite obvious: to prevent funds from being pulled abroad under
fictitious and sham transactions.
A new article “Smuggling of Cash Funds and/or Cash
Instruments” has been added to the Russian Criminal Code
New article 200.1 of the Russian Civil Code
establishes criminal liability for illegal transfer across the customs border
of the Customs Union of cash funds and/or cash instruments, namely, traveller's
cheques, notes, banker's cheques and other documentary securities relating to
fund payment and not identifying the recipient. An amount equivalent to at
least US$ 20 thousand is recognised as a large amount and to US$ 50 thousand or
more as a very large amount. At the same time, amounts permitted for transfer
without declaring in writing (i.e., the equivalent of US$ 10 thousand) or the
declared portion of the amount should be excluded from the calculations.
LEGISLATION ON ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFENCES (FOREIGN EXCHANGE REGULATION)
Amendments to the Russian Code of Administrative
Offences tightens liability for breach of the foreign exchange legislation
New clause 6.4 of article 15.25 of the Russian Code of
Administrative Offences has established a fine for repeat failure to provide
information about cash flows on foreign accounts during a year, failure to
comply with the procedure for providing supporting documents and information in
performing foreign currency operations, breach of rules for transaction
passport issue or breach of the prescribed storage periods for reporting and
accounting documents relating to foreign currency transaction, supporting
documents and information relating to foreign currency operations or
transaction passports. Such a fine for officials may amount to up to 40
thousand Roubles and for legal entities — up to 600 thousand Roubles.
CUSTOMS LEGISLATION
New grounds for refusal to apply special simplified
procedures to approved economic operators (AEO)
The amendments to Federal Law No. 311-FZ “On Customs
Regulation in the Russian Federation” have established that the special
simplified procedures (being the key purpose of obtaining the AEO status) will
not apply to an AEO if it imports goods dispatched by off-shore companies or
pays for imported goods via off-shore zones.
Financial operations with off-shore companies as a new
reason for risk management system response
In accordance with the addenda to article 162 of the
Federal Law “On Customs Regulation in the Russian Federation”, the risk
management system should now also be aimed at preventing breaches relating to
financial operations with residents registered in off-shore zones.
CORPORATE AND FINANCIAL MARKET
LEGISLATION
Liability of parties controlling the debtor in a
bankruptcy case
The provisions regulating secondary liability of
parties controlling a debtor have been amended. In particular, the Law
determines a number of circumstances under which the debtor is presumed to have
been recognised as insolvent (bankrupt) owing to actions and/or omissions by
the controlling parties, this actually meaning presumption of guilt of the
controlling parties.
Moreover, the given Law expands the scope of secondary
liability of parties controlling the debtor. For instance, if the debtor is
recognised as insolvent (bankrupt) owing to actions and/or omissions by the
controlling parties, such parties, if the debtor's property is not sufficient,
will bear secondary liability for all its obligations. Secondary liability
previously applied only to financial obligations and/or obligations to make
mandatory payments.
Obligation to notify the FSFM of acquisition of 10% or
more of the shares (participatory interests) in financial organizations
The Law has introduced the obligation of a person
that, directly or indirectly, individually or together with other persons
related to it on grounds listed by the given Law, has the right to dispose of
10% or more of the votes attached to the voting shares (participatory
interests) in the authorised capital of a qualified securities market player,
insurance company, managing company of an investment fund or a microfinance
institution (for the purposes hereof - the “Financial Institution”), to notify
the relevant Financial Institution and the FSFM to this effect.
If the Financial Institution has not been so notified
or it follows from the notice that the individual entitled to dispose, directly
or indirectly, of 10% or more of the votes attached to the voting shares
(participatory interests) in the Financial Institution is not qualified under
the statutory requirements, such an individual will have the right to dispose
of not more than 10% of the votes attached to the voting shares (participatory
interests). The remaining shares (participatory interests) owned by the
individual will not be counted for the purposes of establishing a quorum at a
general meeting of shareholders (participants) of the relevant Financial
Institution.
The above requirements do not apply to credit
institutions operating as qualified securities market players.
Requirements on founders (participants), CEOs, members
of management bodies and a number of other employees of financial institutions
In accordance with the given Law, persons with an
outstanding conviction for an economic crime or a crime against the state are
not entitled, directly or indirectly, individually or together with other
persons related to them on the grounds listed by the given Law, to obtain the
right to dispose of 10% or more of the votes attached to the voting shares
(participatory interests) in the Financial Institution (as defined above).
The Law also introduces additional requirements on
CEOs, members of management bodies and a number of other employees of qualified
securities market players, insurance companies, managing companies of
investment funds, microfinance organisations and non-state pension funds. In particular,
the following persons may not act as such:
• persons
who performed the functions of the sole executive body of a financial
institution when it committed a breach triggering cancellation (revocation) of
the institution's licence;
• persons,
in relation to which the term when they are deemed to be held administratively
liable by means of disqualification has not yet expired;
• persons
with an outstanding conviction for an economic crime or a crime against the
state.
Additionally, this Law has amended certain legislative
acts relating to combating unlawful financial operations, including the Federal
Laws “On Organisation of Insurance Business in the Russian Federation”, “On
Non-state Pension Funds”, “On Securities Market”, “On Investment Funds”, etc.